Close Menu
  • Instructions
  • News
    • DeFi
    • Smart Contract
    • Markets
    • Web3
    • Adoption
    • Memecoins
    • Analysis
    • Mining
    • Scams
    • Security
  • Education
    • Learn
    • Wallets & Exchange
  • Documentaries
  • Videos
    • Alessio Rastani
    • Altcoin Buzz
    • Coin Bureau
    • Dapp University
    • DataDash
    • Digital asset News
    • EllioTrades Crypto
    • MMCrypto
    • Lark Davis
    • Ivan on Tech
    • Benjamin Cowen
  • Market
    • Crypto Market Cap
    • Heat Map
    • Converter
    • Metal Prices
    • Stock prices
  • Bonus Books
  • Tools
What's Hot

Trident Announces Termination of Deposit Agreement, Concurrent Changes to Share Capital and Direct Listing of Ordinary Shares

June 16, 2026

Onchain Data Locks In Satoshi’s 1.1M BTC Hoard — 3 Theories on Why It Never Moves

June 16, 2026

Iren acquires Spanish AI data center developer Nostrum Group

June 16, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Recession Profit AlertsRecession Profit Alerts
  • Instructions
  • News
    • DeFi
    • Smart Contract
    • Markets
    • Web3
    • Adoption
    • Memecoins
    • Analysis
    • Mining
    • Scams
    • Security
  • Education
    • Learn
    • Wallets & Exchange
  • Documentaries
  • Videos
    • Alessio Rastani
    • Altcoin Buzz
    • Coin Bureau
    • Dapp University
    • DataDash
    • Digital asset News
    • EllioTrades Crypto
    • MMCrypto
    • Lark Davis
    • Ivan on Tech
    • Benjamin Cowen
  • Market
    • Crypto Market Cap
    • Heat Map
    • Converter
    • Metal Prices
    • Stock prices
  • Bonus Books
  • Tools
Recession Profit AlertsRecession Profit Alerts
Home»Markets»How the CFTC Responds When Firms Misrepresent Legal Status
Markets

How the CFTC Responds When Firms Misrepresent Legal Status

September 29, 2023No Comments3 Mins Read

Exchanges and broker-dealers looking to lure customers will naturally take all reasonable steps to appear reputable and transparent. But some go much further and claim legal status that they do not rightfully possess.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on Friday announced charges against eight Florida-based firms for falsely claiming CFTC registration.

The CFTC Clamps Down on False Claims of Legal Status

According to the CFTC’s announcement, eight firms made representations to customers and prospective clients. Claiming that they were either retail foreign exchange dealers or futures commission merchants registered with the CFTC.

The eight respondents are altux-fx-miner, AstroFXMinners, Avadigital-Miners.com, Globalbitasset, Gold Life Investment, Matchlessfxminer, PrimeCapitalTrade, and Trading-Extramining.

The firms traded many different types of products. Including digital assets, options, futures, and forex. They all claimed CFTC registration. And not only that, but the firms claimed membership in the National Futures Association under a common identification number.

The CFTC’s complaint asks for an order requiring all these firms to stop violating the Commodity Exchange Act.

“The CFTC will continue to police fraudulent claims of registration, which harm customers and undermine faith in our regulated markets,” said Ian McGinley, the CFTC’s director of enforcement.

Learn more about the CFTC’s aggressive moves against entities it deems to have betrayed the public’s trust.

Is the CFTC Overstepping Bounds?

This aggressive enforcement action is of a piece with tough rhetoric coming from the CFTC of late. In a September 7 talk, Commissioner Caroline Pham called for “robust guardrails” around the crypto industry and conveyed her demand for a “compliant” sector.  

See also  Securitize names ex-SEC official Brett Redfearn as president ahead of public listing

Pham floated the idea of a pilot program for the digital assets space. But, critically, a program where the CFTC, not crypto firms and exchanges, would devise and enforce the rules. And would have the ultimate say over everything.

The CFTC has grown so proactive that none other than Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has called on the industry to stand up to regulatory bullying. In a September 13 comment posted on X (formerly Twitter), Armstrong said that decentralized finance (DeFi) players are not really subject to the Commodity Exchange Act.

When faced with a choice between settling with the CFTC, and taking a stand in court, firms should do the latter, Armstrong argued. And thereby build a body of law that will be useful in future legal challenges.

“My hope is that these DeFi protocols take these cases to court to establish precedent. The courts have been very willing to uphold rule of law,” he stated.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.



Source link

CFTC Firms Legal Misrepresent Responds Status

Related Posts

Onchain Data Locks In Satoshi’s 1.1M BTC Hoard — 3 Theories on Why It Never Moves

June 16, 2026

Here is why Strategy's dividend-paying crypto stock is crashing to near-historic lows

June 16, 2026

Is California Reaching Critical Mass?

June 16, 2026

Coinbase intoduces AI advisor, stock options, and pre-IPO markets in finance push

June 16, 2026
Top Posts

Fed decision tonight will likely decide whether Bitcoin gets past $80k or fall further

March 18, 2026

Crypto Stolen From Indian Businessman Used by Hamas in Attacks on Israel

October 13, 2023

Goodman Group Announces Cash Tender Offer

April 21, 2026

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.