Publication: The opinions and opinions expressed here are exclusively to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of the editorial editorial of crypto.news.
Protocols are currently stuck: bicycles between stimulating inflow and inevitable outflow of liquidity as providers and higher returns. Even with existing solutions for bridges and packing, due to concerns about complexity and security, most retail investors are unable to effectively distribute their assets on protocols.
This allows more than $ 400 billion in inactive assets to be transferred to Siled Necklaces while protocols in Defi compete for limited liquidity, their demand that greatly exceeds the available supply. Without a global liquidity to unlock these inactive assets and enable a shared source of liquidity, Defi will have difficulty replacing traditional finances and achieving global acceptance.
Maybe you also like it: The end of payment friction: Why Stablecoins and on-chain win liquidity Opinion
The liquidity problem
Traditional finances thrives on deep, integrated capital markets. The centralized structure of global banks means that liquidity thresholds can be proactively regulated to maintain solvency, and the large number of participants in permeefele world markets means that there is always capital circulating within a certain system.
Defi, on the other hand, remains fragmented. A lack of compatibility between competing chains fractures the liquidity of an already small user base, while not technical participants have difficulty moving their assets with the interoperability solutions that are currently existing. This limits the possibilities of Defi as a financial system; Simply put, people can do less with their capital. This problem is recorded in the one-two stump of stagnation and under-utilization.
Without access to sufficient liquidity, struggling products to maintain trade volumes, credit capacity and user activity. To attract liquidity, new projects issue native tokens and offer high Apys or Governance solutions. Although these strategies succeed in the short term, this capital remains trapped in individual ecosystems.
These ecosystems suffer from sharp outflows when rewards decrease or are improved elsewhere, delaying the growth of new and potentially innovative projects. We even see this in previously dominant protocols, with Ethereum (ETH) struggling in the past year. This comes from a cultural shift in Defi road from promises of long -term use and instead to fast return on memecoins on the basis of Solana (SOL), so that capital is pulled from one silo to another.
Both the symptoms and the causes of some of these liquidity problems are the enormous amount of under -utilized capital in Defi. Unlocking this capital also offers an important solution. If we talk about $ 400 billion in vain assets in Defi, we are talking about ‘Premier’ tokens such as XRP (XRP), Bitcoin (BTC), Dogecoin (Doge); Tokens with a high market capitalization, but a relatively low TVL.
These tokens lack the ability to be used effectively in setting and acting, or many of their holders lack the technical skills or interest in deploying and resting for an optimized yield. This represents a substantial imbalance in the total asset rating and the associated Defi protocol activity. If we can remedy this imbalance, there would be a flood of liquidity on the market. This would start the process of investment and innovation that Defi needs.
To a global liquidity layer
If Defi has to detach itself from the cycle of fragmented liquidity and short -term stimuli, this must follow the lead of Tradfi. The most important thing is that it must develop a shared liquidity infrastructure to enable the frictionless stream of assets that potential users expect.
The industry is not blind to these problems and there are already early steps in the direction of global liquidity. Protocols such as Wormhole and Layerzero allow smart contracts to complete orders about chains. Elsewhere, on intention-based protocols and progress in zero knowledge tickets, to push the boundaries of Defi’s UX, making capital movement just as simple as in Tradfi offers.
For example, a uniform liquidity layer can create an XRP market on Solana, a doge market on Avalanche (Avax) and a Cardano (ADA) market based. This would enable Defi projects to function as large-scale tradfi institutions, which benefit from deep and stable capital pools, reducing the need for constant stimulation programs.
Over time, this would eliminate the short term of APY wars, which encourages lenders with more trust assets, with a uniform liquidity framework that softening exposure risks without endangering. Capital would be fully used, liquidity would flow freely to where it is needed and the growth of Defi would accelerate.
This would be a breakthrough for retail users. With accessible cross-chain markets, retail investors can easily diversify their assets without navigating complex bridges or takes unnecessary risks. In addition, simplified UX would lower technical barriers, making it accessible to users from the first day. With reduced exposure, retail users can participate in Defi full of confidence, stimulating adoption, introducing billions of dollars in new markets and allowing Defi to achieve his lucrative potential.
However, if Defi is really serious about global liquidity, large ecosystems must go beyond isolated solutions and shared standards via interoperable liquidity shubs or decentralized coordination mechanisms. Founders and developers must work together for a healthy and prosperous ecosystem, not compete for limited resources.
The shift to unlocking the free flowing markets of Defi’s future needs more than one internal market product. It will result from a persistent industrial effort: a cultural shift to ambitious and user -friendly product offers that take into account the needs of both the markets and the customers of the future.
Conclusion
Defi’s liquidity problem is more than a matter of inefficiency; It points to structural, cultural and systemic issues within the industry. Only a coordinated response will enable Defi to reach his potential. The industry is locked in a cycle of short -term stimuli, with important assets Siled and protocols that compete for fragmented capital; Without a structural shift to a global liquidity layer, Defi will have difficulty scaling, innovating or offering real alternatives to Tradfi.
The foundations for this shift exist; It may even be going on, but a coordinated response remains. For those who believe in Defi’s mission, however, is a future in which liquidity moves freely over chains, non-consumable; It is the only way ahead.
Read more: Ethereum does not need any other Rollup | Opinion
Altan Tutar
Altan Tutar is the co-founder and CEO of Moremarkets, a global liquidity market. He has previously worked at Near Foundation, both as a core contribution carrier and a member of the Senior Technical Business Development Team.
