US spot Bitcoin ETFs post a seven-day outflow with $355 million in new inflows, led by BlackRock, ARK 21Shares and Fidelity funds.
Summary
- US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw net inflows of $355 million on December 30, ending a seven-day outflow of $1.12 billion from major issuers.
- BlackRock, ARK 21Shares and Fidelity led the recovery, while Bitwise, VanEck and Grayscale also recorded smaller positive flows.
- The single positive session has not recovered from earlier losses, leaving traders to watch early January flows for a clearer shift in sentiment.
U.S. exchange-traded Bitcoin funds recorded net inflows of $355 million on Dec. 30, ending a seven-day outflow that totaled more than $1.12 billion, according to daily flow data.
The reversal marked the first positive session after a sustained period of pullbacks across the sector. Over the past week, daily outflows have often topped $150 million, with one of the biggest single-day declines on Dec. 26, the data showed.
US Bitcoin ETFs saw an inflow of 355 million
According to flow data, BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF led the inflows with about $143.7 million on December 30. The Fidelity fund recorded inflows of $78.6 million, while the ARK Invest and 21Shares funds added $109.6 million.
Additional inflows came from the $13.9 million Bitwise fund, the $5.0 million VanEck fund, and the Grayscale product, which recorded $4.3 million. Several other funds reported no material activity for the session.
Inflows were spread across multiple issuers, unlike the previous week when outflows affected almost all major funds uniformly. Continued selling in late December pushed total weekly losses above the $1 billion threshold.
Most spot Bitcoin ETFs currently charge annual fees between 0.19% and 0.25%, with some exceptions at higher and lower levels. Inflows as of Dec. 30 were not exclusively concentrated in the lowest-cost products, but spread across several major issuers, the data showed.
The positive flows on December 30 interrupted the downward trend, but could not offset the losses of the previous week. Market observers noted that subsequent trading sessions would be needed in early January to determine whether the reversal represents a sustained shift in investor sentiment or a temporary lull in selling activity.
