The following is a guest post and analysis by Maarten Henskens, head of Astar Foundation.
Web3 has a problem with capturing value. Despite billions of market capitalization, most projects continue to get value from their communities instead of giving it back. While venture capitalists and founders pick considerable rewards through token sales and fortress schedules, Early Adopters and members of the community see that actual adoption often stimulate decreasing returns over time.
This must change and community-governed treasury management is the most effective way to make it happen.
The value -return required
Crypto has been operated too long under a fundamental extractive model. Projects constantly dilute the token value by increasing the offer through subsidies, stimuli and foundations, so that their communities can absorb this inflation. In the meantime, the income that is generated by these ecosystems flows – either due to gas costs, sequencer income or application costs – rarely back to the token holders who have engaged the success of the project in the first place.
Without mechanisms to give back value to members of the community, projects can be confronted with increasing problems maintaining involvement, loyalty and growth over time. The industry is starting to recognize this challenge, with various protocols that investigate new approaches from Treasury Management that prioritize the benefit of the community.
Community-first Treasury Management
Projects have an ethical obligation to give value back to their communities as soon as they reach scale and sustainability. Those who have offered early liquidity, built the first applications and have taken risks during uncertain phases deserve to participate in the success of the project, further than just Token valuation.
Strategic return offers a transparent and efficient mechanism to meet this obligation. When Offchain Labs announced its strategic purchase plan for ARB tokens, critics assumed that it was a price provision mechanism. By gradually acquiring tokens according to predetermined parameters, Offchain Labs even creates a positive and necessary relationship between network use and community value.
Movement laboratories showed similar thinking when they established their strategic reserve after repairing $ 38 million from a Mogue market maker. Instead of focusing these funds on team compensation or traditional Treasury management, they have committed themselves to a transparent, three-month return program with publicly visible wallet addresses.
Every blockchain community should consider similar approaches.
Astar is now taking a clear step in the direction of that future with the Astar Finance Committee (AFC)-a new initiative that is designed to manage treasury resources in full coordination with the long-term interests of the community.
The mandate of the AFC is simple but powerful: manage the DAO allocation transparent, investigate reinvestment strategies that improve the ecosystem and create the management mechanisms that guarantee accountability and collective input with every step.
From theory to exercise
Common financing is based on a dedicated administrative body whose foundation is to transform unused resources into sustainable value for the governed ecosystem.
Instead of leaving treasury management to a small team or allow valuable resources to be inactive, ecosystems must create a structured committee with representatives from the entire ecosystem, generally including a Core Foundation, a representative council and the broader collective.
This lays strategic financial decisions in the hands of those with the expertise to implement them while maintaining transparency and accountability for the entire community. Treasury Operations is given transparency and governance is authorized to explore multiple ways to generate sustainable income flows that can be reinvested in the ecosystem.
What makes this model particularly powerful is the flexibility and supervision of the community. The committee regularly evaluates potential strategies of the provision of liquidity on loan protocols and DEXs to set up assets and investing in projects at an early stage. All activities must be carried out with regular reporting and public access to multisig transactions.
Beyond Grants: self -sufficient ecosystems
The subsidy-dependent model that has dominated a crypto for years should be seen as training wheels that ultimately have to come loose. Although effective for bootstrapping activities, distributing tokens to stimulate acceptance only catch the inevitable settlement with value.
Common government management represents the following evolutionary stage in Tokenomics. By implementing transparent mechanisms for value-returns through burns, purchasing (carried out in accordance with relevant regulations) or ecosystem investment-can create projects that improve self-raised systems that benefit all participants.
This creates something that only Web3 can offer: cooperation economy. Well -designed treasury operations ensure that success is really collective.
Transparency as a requirement
For returning to achieve their goal of community enrichment instead of market manipulation, transparency is non-considerable. Projects must clearly communicate the exact source of funds for Treasury operations; specific parameters that dictate timing and execution; Governance mechanisms that offer community overview; And the long -term strategy behind the initiative.
Regular reporting (monthly small reports and quarterly major reports), public multisig portfolios and transparent implementation of all operations ensure that the community can verify and validate any action.
When users can verify that the income from sequencer or protocol costs are re -invested in return by transparent transactions on chain, this reinforces confidence in the ecosystem. This distinguishes legitimate value-return programs of attempts on short price manipulation.
A call for evolution in industry
Every blockchain project that generates meaningful income and is serious about long-term sustainability and community coordination should implement a form of community manager.
The pioneers who implement these programs nowadays have been determined what will soon be industrial standard practice. By creating transparent mechanisms for valuation mechanisms, surrendered by the community, they create a logical and inspectable link between network acceptance and community interest that benefits those who make the ecosystem possible.
Although these approaches do not solve every problem in web3, they tackle something that the space has missed a lot: a systematic relationship between ecosystem success and community advantage. It is time to return to the communities that made these networks possible – not only with appreciation, but with real, measurable returns that are controlled by the communities themselves.
