The following article is a guest post and an opinion of Maksym Sakharov, Co-founder and CEO by Wefi
Last month, the Japanese financial service agency proposed a wholesaler for reclassification of cryptocurrencies that would introduce a flat load of 20% on the income of digital assets and would help in introducing crypto exchange funds.
For a long time, the progressive tax system of the country has imposed levies on crypto -winsts at a maximum of 55%, a factor that many feel, makes investing in crypto quite unattractive.
Institutionalized slowness
However, this is not the only obstacle in the path of a potential Bitcoin ETF approval in Japan; It is not even the most urgent. At the end of last year, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba apparently rejected The idea of crypto ETFs, wondering whether the government should promote digital assets such as traditional investments.
His prevailing coalition lost his majority in the higher house after a bruising match that saw them fall three seats that shy for the 50 needed to retain their advantage. But even if the political control is in balance and Ishiba promises to stay, regardless of the election result, one thing remained consistent: the deep-rooted caution of Japan.
The non -binding attitude of ISHIBA on ETF approvals is just a symptom of a deeper malaise. The regulatory reflex of the country is not just about consumer safety – it is about a deep -rooted compliance culture that has risks resistant to all risks at all costs. This mentality, not the much malignant 55% crypto tax, is what really stifles innovation.
The irony is that Japan once was ahead of neighbors such as South Korea and Hong Kong. The recognized crypto as a means of payment in 2017 and built some of the world’s earliest regulatory infrastructure. Furthermore, Metaplanet will start a wave of Bitcoin purchases by Japanese listed companies in the second quarter of 2024, Gather a treasury Worth the last count of almost $ 2 billion in BTC. And that’s not all. Progress has also been made in the development of stablecoins and crypto payment infrastructure, in which Sumitomo MITUI signed a mou with AVA laboratories and fire blocks in preparation to publish Fiat-Pegged cryptocurrencies.
Yet a bureaucratic labyrinth -killing companies lies under these apparent success stories. Under the current framework, small startups with dreams of offering virtual asset services have found it difficult to meet the strict requirements that include extensive documentation, a local bank account, a compliance team established in Japan and at least 10 million yen in capital.
Some can claim that the rules are there to protect users, and that is valid. But couldn’t there be a happy balance between consumer protection and play area for innovation? It almost feels like the FSA isolates regulators of builders, where pencil parders design rules without testing them against Real-World technical limitations.
If taxes were the real barrier for web3 innovation, the proposed reforms of the FSA would ignite a tree.
Roadmap reform
In order to run compliance with the competitiveness, Japan has to re -wip some of his long -term approaches. To begin with, the government must assume the pre-approval model of sun sins and a faster system with which release tokens with post-launch audits can exchange. Here tokens simply have to comply with the fulfillment institution and the requirements for security that must be stated. Full regulatory and technical audits can then be performed within 30 days of the launch. In this way, investor protection is still stored by enforceable audits sanctions and deletion authority, while at the same time dramatically reduces the lead times.
The country’s supervisors must also launch dynamic sandboxes that can use zero knowledge for privacy-safe verification. There is also a need for capital injection of the state. Japan could create an FSA-Match fund of $ 500 million that directly supports web3 startups that meet security benchmarks, which effectively gets some skin in the game.
Finally, to promote cooperation and to shake off his bureaucratic insulation, the financial regulator was able to reach the site of the founders of Tech in his advisory councils. This would look first and foremost at pain points in industry, so that the policy can form with the end user in mind instead of being defensive, status quo-retention of principles.
These are not radical requirements. They are already standard in the jurisdictions that are now leading global crypto acceptance.
Builders watch. With populist parties such as Sanseito Traction The political winds shift on “Japan First” rhetoric. If the coalition of ISHIBA falls, a new administration can herald a more innovation -friendly era. But only if the regulators of Japan are turning away from their risk -aging DNA. Without that shift, tax reform will be cosmetic, ETFs will remain in the dark and the early benefit of Japan in Crypto in history will fade.
