Ronin’s decision to migrate back to Ethereum as a full network of Layer 2 raises a big question: losing in -standing blockchains terrain of the growing layer 2 -ecosystem of Ethereum? With Ethereum -Upgrades that improve the speed and lowering costs, the case becomes more difficult to ignore sidechains.
Important collection restaurants
-
Ronin moves back to Ethereum as a layer 2, with reference to security, scalability and cost improvements.
-
Sidechains are confronted with growing pressure as Ethereum Layer 2 networks grow up and attract institutional acceptance.
-
Immutable X and Polygon remain strong players in gaming, but are confronted with competition from the scaling route map of Ethereum.
-
Ronin’s proof-of-distribution model shifts incentives from validators to active builders.
-
Security incidents on Ronin emphasize the risks of performing independent sidechains.
Why Ronin returns to Ethereum
Ronin Started as a gaming sidechain for Axie Infinity, with low costs and fast transactions when Ethereum had limitations. After Ethereum 2.0 -upgrades Ronin made transactions cheaper and more efficient, thought it was more logical to become an Ethereum layer 2.
By going back, Ronin inherits the decentralization of Ethereum, the institutional momentum and the security model. It also distinguishes itself from earlier exploits, including the $ 625 million hack in 2022 and the operation of $ 12 million in 2024, which exposed the vulnerabilities of smaller sidechains.
Invariable x: Promise versus Plateau
Unchangeable x are on the road to be the best platform for NFTs and gamingWith the help of zero-knowledge rollups. The technology works well, but the actual acceptance is not linked to the early excitement. Apart from some important partnerships, the growth of gaming is delayed. The goal of becoming the most important game chain did not happen on the scale that many have hoped for.
A challenge for unchanging X is the scary focus. By concentrating on NFTs and gaming, it tied up its growth to markets that can be unpredictable. When the play-to-ear trend faded, there were fewer large games to keep the activity high and smaller developers did not come along that quickly. Without a more use scenarios or a larger developer base, unchangeable X can end as a niche platform instead of an option for top layer 2.
Polygon: versatility or fragmentation?
Polygon Positioned himself as a versatile scale and offered everything from proof-of-stake chains to ZK rollups. At first glance, this reach suggests adaptability, but in practice it can create more noise than clarity.
Much of the momentum of polygon is fed by incentives, subsidies and aggressive marketing campaigns instead of deep, organic developer spending. While headline partnerships attract attention, there are still questions about how much of that activity translates into sustainable, long-term use.
The most important risk for polygon tries to do too much at the same time. This can make his focus unclear and make developers uncertain about which products will last. In this case, it may be more versatile for polygon to become a leader in a certain area.
The upgrades of Ethereum change the game
Ethereum’s relocation to Proof-of-stake And recent scale updates have changed things. Gas costs, which used to push projects to Sidechains, have fallen and the network can now handle more transactions.
Now developers and investors do not have to choose between costs and security. Instead of carrying out individual chains, projects can use the strong infrastructure of Ethereum and benefit from the large pool of liquidity and developers.
New tokenomics and incentives
One of the more interesting aspects of Ronin’s transition is the new proof-of-distribution model. Instead of rewarding validators, Ronin will distribute stimuli among developers, liquidity providers and other contributors.
This approach is intended to support real growth in the ecosystem. It also shows that the future is not only about keeping chains safe, but about rewarding people who help build and maintain these communities.
Security as a decisive factor
Security is still the largest weakness for Sidechains. The most important Ronin-Hack in 2022 was a wake-up call for the entire industry. By going to Layer 2 from Ethereum, Ronin lowers his risk of branches and other problems with small chains.
For projects that consider their next steps, this migration is a reminder that trust and safety matter just as much as the performance.
Is leaving Sidechains the future?
Ronin’s return to Ethereum suggests that leaving sidechains can become a trend, especially if Ethereum continues to strengthen. Although networks such as unchanging X and Polygon still have unique positions, the market seems to consolidate around the Ethereum scale ecosystem.
For developers, this shift is a chance to build on infrastructure that balances costs, speed and security. For investors it is a sign that the influence of Ethereum does not fade, it is getting stronger.
