Existing DeFi vaults fall short where it matters most

Defi -Vlubruizen should change everything. For a while it felt like they had done that. With just a few clicks, users can deposit their crypto and have them forwarded by complex, automated strategies. No banks, no managers, not waiting, only smart contracts that do all the work. But the reality is that the vault model did not live up to the hype.

Maybe you also like it: Defi must prepare for his next phase: the convergence of smart money and block chains | Opinion

The most important idea is still logical. Automating version via code deleted a large piece of the luggage of the old system. It is not necessary to trust someone to hold your money or to exchange the right exchange. That alone is a huge step forward. But Defi not only needed new rails. It needed better coordination. It needed a way to actually connect people with skills, capital and insight. That part never came together completely.

The current vault model has not been enough to push Defi past his niche. To reach Defi the mainstream, we need stronger coordination, better risk management, transparency and trust.

No way to know who you trust

Ironically, although safes have removed the need to trust someone with your money, they created a new kind of trust problem. You still trust the person who has created the strategy. The problem is that you rarely know who that is.

Most safes do not verify managers. Managers are the people or teams who design and implement trade strategies in a safe. They decide how your money is invested, but in most Defi platforms you don’t know who they are, what their track record is, or that they are good.

Most safes do not offer records for managers. There is no reputation system, no skill validation, no real identity linked to the person behind the transactions. That’s fine if you just experiment with a few dollars. But if you really assign capital, it starts to feel more like a gamble than as an investment.

Discovery and risk management are a mess

Even if you wanted to invest in safes, how would you choose? Most platforms offer little to no curation. There is no personalization, no ranking system, no way to follow proven strategies or the best performing. It is as if you are dropped in a busy market without drawing, labels or recommendations. You have been left to wander and hope that you will encounter something good.

That is frustrating for users. It is limiting for the makers of Kluis. It creates a system where great strategies may never be noticed, and users as standard in what is trending, not what is good for their goals.

To draw lessons from the past, the history of financial risk management is a long and evolving one. It reflects decades of change in financial systems, technological improvements and a deeper insight into what risk actually is. The Crypto and Defi space, although still in the early stages, clearly follows a similar path.

The problem is that most Defi -Vluizen have not been overtaken. There is often no framework for basic risk management, no position caps, no delayed disclosures, no protection against market manipulation or forced liquidations. Vaults can automate the implementation, but they leave everything else to chance.

The history of financial risk management is a story about learning mistakes, getting smarter with figures and trying to build a more stable and less scary “money game” for everyone. It is a constant attempt to avoid the next big “uh oh” moment.

Until Defi takes that lesson seriously, safes remain users. Risk is not just about protecting capital. It is about creating systems that people can trust, even when markets change.

Too much transparency can harm performance

In the first instance, exposing strategy logic and activity in the chain seemed a victory. Users can see exactly what happens to their money, up to the trade. But here is the catch. Serious traders rely on discretion. They don’t want their movement to be copied or at the front run. When strategies are completely public in real time, the lead disappears.

For every trader who manages meaningful capital, this is a non-starter. It is as if you are trying to win a race where everyone sees your blueprint. No wonder that many of the best operators from Defi -Vluizen have remained. They have no way to protect their lead.

Last thoughts

These issues all come back to one big theme: Defi Vaults focused too much on implementation and not enough on coordination. They removed the intermediaries, but never replaced the things that actually help people to make smart investment decisions. Things such as verified skills, smart discovery aids and protection for strategies for much conviction.

What Defi needs afterwards is not just more automation. It needs better coordination between retail investors and Kluis managers. It needs infrastructure that helps you to find the right strategies, see who is behind it and to invest with confidence. It should feel more if discovering a top creator on YouTube, guess which anonymous wallet could perform this week.

We have seen what is possible if smart contracts perform the backend. Now it’s time to repair the front, the human part. Vaults were a strong first step. But if we want Defi investing is useful, scalable and reliable, it’s time to think bigger. Not only faster contracts, but smarter coordination.

Read more: Return are the ultimate proof-of-resilience in Defi | Opinion