Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of the crypto.news main article.
If you spend enough time on The largest asset manager in the world is roughly in place $13.5 trillion in assets under management, has become shorthand for opening the institutional floodgates. It is the last stamp of legitimacy. But what if that whole premise is backwards? What if, instead of BlackRock entering “crypto, crypto,” and more specifically, an autonomous blockchain infrastructure, BlackRock starts making it irrelevant?
Summary
- Agentic Finance challenges institutions: Emerging on-chain autonomous systems can allocate capital, manage risk and execute strategies without human intermediaries – making traditional asset managers like BlackRock obsolete.
- Automation is redefining asset management: AI-driven, intent-based frameworks transform “assets under management” into “assets under autonomy,” replacing top-down portfolio control with user-centric, programmable coordination.
- The Post-Institutional Era: As finance becomes transparent, on-chain and open-source, trust shifts from human oversight to verifiable code – marking a structural shift from institutional dominance to decentralized autonomy.
That’s not a throwaway line. The core argument here is that asset management and financial coordination – historically the last fortress of the traditional financial system – are on the verge of becoming automated, decentralized and personalized beyond recognition. The “agentic” financial frameworks now emerging across the chain could ultimately take over the very function that makes BlackRock powerful: the ability to broker intentions and allocate capital at scale. Many readers will disagree, arguing that trust, regulation and complexity make such automation impossible. But to dismiss this possibility would be a mistake; the technology is already catching up.
As of September, BlackRock’s assets under management reached a record high of $13.46 trillionabout four times the entire cryptocurrency market capitalization. The company’s ETF empire, its “pre-mixed spice jars,” to borrow a Redditor’s known analogy, simplified investing for the masses. Buying one share of an S&P 500 index fund meant instant diversification across 500 companies. It is elegant, efficient and human-curated. The problem is that the same structure has become a bottleneck. ETFs and managed portfolios are top-down coordination systems that rely on human oversight, regulatory restrictions and centralized custody. They are stable, yes, but static.
Now compare that to the growing sophistication of autonomous, blockchain-based financial agents. The rise of DeFi not only enabled permissionless trading; it made programmable coordination possible. What started as smart contracts that move liquidity between pools have evolved into frameworks that can parse strategies, optimize capital allocation, and execute purposefully without human intervention. This is the thesis behind Agentic Finance, developed by teams like Kuvi through the Agentic Finance Operating System (AFOS). The concept is simple but radical: the coordination layer of the financial sector itself, which decides what happens to assets and why, can be automated.
From human expertise to autonomous strategy
For centuries, asset management was exclusive precisely because it required human expertise. You needed analysts, brokers and asset allocators to structure risk and find returns. AI and agentic systems are rewriting that assumption. A single intelligent framework can now read hundreds of charts, interpret market signals, test strategies and reallocate assets in real time – all faster and cheaper than any portfolio manager. Once you add on-chain execution, transparent auditability, and permissionless access, the traditional barriers collapse.
Critics will call this naive. They will argue that regulation, human psychology, and macro-level risk require oversight—that machines cannot mimic fiduciary responsibility or judgment. Reasonable. But that’s exactly what every industry said before software ate it. In the 1980s, trading pits rejected electronic exchanges. In the 2010s, banks completely rejected crypto. Today, stablecoins settle trillions of dollars monthly on Ethereum (ETH), and Bitcoin (BTC) is considered a macro hedge asset. The idea that human-run institutions will forever monopolize financial intermediation is starting to sound more nostalgic than rational.
Assets under autonomy
If agentic frameworks like AFOS succeed, we will witness a migration of assets – not just from traditional funds to DeFi protocols, but from managed products to self-driven, automated systems. Imagine a user instructs an on-chain agent to “Allocate my liquidity to mid-cap DeFi protocols with Sharpe ratios above 2.0 and auto-rebalance weekly.” The agent executes, measures performance, and adapts. There is no fund manager, no custodian and no brokerage fees; only pure intention, translated into coordinated action. That’s not science fiction. The infrastructure is currently being quietly built up.
The shift will not happen overnight. Institutions still have the highest level of regulation and the trust of pension funds, governments and companies. But the arc of financial innovation always bends toward access and freedom of action. Stablecoins have eroded the banks’ monopoly on money movement. Tokenization is beginning to challenge the exclusivity of private markets. The next frontier – intent brokering and asset coordination – is the last monopoly left. When this breaks, the entire premise of “assets under management” can be redefined as “assets under autonomy.”
Some readers may find this threatening, perhaps even reckless. They may argue that committing capital to code is dangerous, and that decentralized coordination leads to chaos. They’re not wrong about the risk. But innovation has always followed that line. The truth is that we already entrust our wealth to algorithms, whether passive index rebalancing or quantitative ETFs. The difference now is that these systems are on-chain, transparent and user-controlled. The opacity of Wall Street structures will no longer be a hallmark; it will be an obligation.
The institutional parallel: BlackRock’s dilemma
If this statement proves true, the impact on the market could mirror the effect of the early Internet on the media. Initially, newspapers made fun of bloggers. Then they lost distribution. Likewise, asset managers could dismiss autonomous frameworks as “DeFi toys.” But once users realize that agentic systems can coordinate portfolios, execute credit strategies, or even participate in supply chain management more efficiently than institutions, the story turns. The cost structure collapses, access expands and capital migrates.
To its credit, BlackRock has read the writing on the wall. His foray into tokenized funds and Bitcoin ETFs shows that digital infrastructure is the next growth channel. But even that adjustment may not be enough if the underlying function, intent mediation, becomes open-source. When someone can deploy an intelligent financial agent that can do what a fund manager does, the trillion-dollar question shifts from “who manages your money?” to “what framework carries out your intention?”
The next decade of crypto won’t just be about price cycles or ETF approvals. It will be about the disintermediation of financial decision-making itself. Asset management will not disappear, but its architecture will change, from hierarchical to modular, from proprietary to permissionless, from human-mediated to agentic. That’s not anti-institution; it is post-institution. And when the dust settles, we may discover that BlackRock’s greatest legacy was not its dominance, but the inevitability of its obsolescence.
