As the crypto landscape evolves, repeating has emerged as one of the most popular stories of 2025. In this interview, Lucio Tato, a core contribution carrier at Meta Pool, shares his insights into how the protocol embraces, improving multi-chain deployment, improving decentralization and preparing the sliding bare-bare economy. From innovations of liquid innovations to validator onboarding on Near, Tato outlines a vision where accessibility and resilience go hand in hand.
Reformulating is a trending story in Crypto, how do you adjust or do you integrate repairing mechanisms?
Meta Pool follows the repairing story. We have a mechanism in Solana for leverage and repetition. At the moment you can use SOL, MSL, Jitosol, BSOL and Hubsol, and through leverage you get around 9% APY (+2% over other LSTs). That strike architecture not only offers this boost, but is also ready to harvest for extra yield solana-restrainting platforms.
Can you explain how the approach of Meta Pool distinguishes from protocols such as Lido or Eigenlaer for the use of liquids?
The liquid setting of Meta Pool for Ethereum has an interesting architecture: it builds up the stealing rewards every second. This means that you can only use ETH for a few hours and that you get rewards. Other platforms such as Lido only build daily rewards. We also use distributed validator services via SSV, so the protocol itself is resilient. It is designed with multiple protection layers, so the set ETH is safe. A few weeks ago we went through a Real-World, High-Stakes Brand test. We had exploited a vulnerability, but thanks to the architecture of the contract and a controlled liquidity, the losses were minimal, which is only part of the liquidity in Uniswap that only represents 0.5% of the TVL. All ETH used remained safe during the test. For more info you can view the blog in Metapool.App
What is your opinion about the sustainability of placing yields in a world of multiple chains?
That’s it, and it will remain a world of several chains! Our focus is on making it easy for everyone to participate in setting out in multiple chains and not only to help with decentralization, but also to pick the stealing rewards. Our multi-chain approach reduces the dependence on the economy of a single chain, so we believe that our users are covered and they can always compare rewards and decide on our web page for the front.
Which chains or ecosystems are you currently supporting or are you planning to expand to the next?
Meta Pool currently supports close by, Ethereum, Solana, Story and ICP (DFINITY). We actively investigate other block chains such as Sui and are planning to support Layer 2 solutions such as arbitrum and optimism. Future goals can be Polkadot for interoperability and cosmos-based chains for cross-chain synergies, in accordance with our mission to democratize access to different ecosystems, especially for users in rising markets.
How do you manage Validatoriesdentcentralization and security in your deployment model?
Validator Decentralization is the core of the Meta Pool model. We select Validators through an automated process, balance between yield and decentralization. To prevent centralization, Cap Validator Stake allocations and encourage smaller, independent validators to participate, which increases the Nakamoto -Coefficient and improve the resilience of the network.
We currently have dozens of solo validators through our junction studio program on board a validator in the nearby blockchain, with a few clicks and only $ 30 a month. We offer the first commitment, the operator starts with a break-even comparison or even a small profit!
Is there a plan to stimulate long -term use versus short -term flipping of strike tokens?
Yes, we are planning to stimulate long -term deployment through layered remuneration structures and potential management benefits. Strikers who lock for longer periods receive increased yields and increased voting authority in the DAO, which encourages the dedication. The program is planned, not yet implemented. Since there are proposals in the nearby ecosystem to reduce rewards, we want to be ready for our community in case those proposals are assumed, so that they can retain the same level of rewards until the proposal effects stabilize. Reducing inflation is normally good for native token in the medium and long term, but also reduces rewards in the short term.
