The average stablecoin -liquidity per token fell from $ 1.8 million in 2021 to just $ 5,500 in March 2025, a decrease of 99.7%, forcing protocols to prove good reasons for investors.
By one Recent report Decentralized by research agency, the drop illustrates how rising token issue, which now surpasses 40 million assets, has watered over capital without a corresponding increase in question or user conservation.
The report framed this trend as proof of a zero-sum dynamics in crypto-capital allocation, in which the inflow of new tokens exceeds the expansion of capital pools, resulting in a lower liquidity, weaker communities and reduced involvement.
Without sustainable sources of income, user interesting often disappears after short -term stimuli such as Airdrops. Without sustainable economic structures, attention has become a liability than an active one.
Liquidity compression
The report used Stablecoin -Liquidity as a proxy for capital availability. It emphasized that the stagnation of new capital flows in the midst of rising token counts has left many crypto projects under the Capitalized.
With fewer sources per token, the traditional Playbook from the 2021 era-one-a community is launching through Discord servers and airdrop campaigns-not longer-lasting involvement.
Instead, the report argues, projects must now demonstrate the fit and sustainable demand of product markets by generating income.
Turnover functions as a financial statistics and as a mechanism for identifying relevance and economic use. Protocols that generate and retain cash flows are better positioned to justify token evaluation, to determine legitimacy of governance and to maintain user participation.
The report distinguished between adult platforms such as Ethereum (ETH), which depend on ecosystem depth and native stimuli, and newer protocols that have to earn their place through consistent performance and transparent operations.
Varying capital needs and strategies
The report outlined four decay stages for crypto projects: explorers, climbers, titans and seasonal. Each category forms a different relationship with capital formation, risk tolerance and value distribution.
Explorers are protocols at an early stage that work with centralized administration and fleeting, stimulation -driven income. While some, such as Synthetix and Balancer, show peaks in use in the short term, their primary goal continues to survive instead of profitability.
Climbers, with an annual turnover between $ 10 million and $ 50 million, are starting to switch from emissions -based growth to user conservation and ecosystem management. These projects must navigate strategic decisions on growth versus distribution and at the same time retain a momentum.
Titans – such as Aave, Uniswap and Hyperliquid – generate consistent income, have decentralized management structures and working with strong network effects. Their focus is category dominance, not diversification. Due to the established treasuries and operational discipline of the Titans, they can afford to buy back token or other value limit programs.
Seasonal, on the other hand, short-lived phenomena are powered by hype-cycles and social momentum. Projects such as FriendTech and Pumpfun experience short periods of high activity, but struggle to maintain the interest of users or income consistency in the long term.
Although some evolve, most speculative games remain without staying the relevance of infrastructure.
Income distribution models
Parallels with public stock markets, the report noted that younger companies generally reinvest the profit, while adult companies return capital through dividends or returns.
In Crypto, this distinction is bound by protocol maturity in the same way. Titans are well positioned to implement back -buying or structured distributions, while explorers and climbers are advised to concentrate on reinvestment until operational basic principles are protected.
According to the report, BEKOOK is a flexible distribution tool that is particularly suitable for projects with volatile income or seasonal question patterns.
However, the report warned that poorly executed return of short -term traders can benefit holders of long -term. Effective repurchase programs require strong treasury reserves, valuation discipline and transparent version. Without this, distribution can run trust and misread capital.
The trend reflects wider shifts in traditional markets. In 2024, Back purchase accounted for around 60% of the distribution of business profit, which exceeded dividends.
This approach enables companies to modulate capital efficiency according to market conditions, but the risks of governance continue to exist if the incentives that stimulate return decisions are incorrectly aligned.
Investor relationships are crucial
The report identified investor relationships (IR) as a critical but underdeveloped function in crypto projects. Despite public claims of transparency, most teams issue financial data selectively.
To build sustainable trust with token holders and institutional participants, a more institutional approach, including quarterly reporting, real -time dashboards and clear disclosure of distribution, is needed.
Leading projects are starting to implement these standards. Aave’s “Buy and Distribut” program, supported by a treasury of $ 95 million, allocates $ 1 million every week to structured return.
Hyperliquid devotes 54% of the turnover to Back purchase and 46% to LP stimuli, using income only without external venture financing. Jupiter introduced the Lurfbox confidence as a non-complainant mechanism to manage only $ 9.7 million in Jup for future benefits after achieving financial sustainability.
These examples show that responsible capitulation assignment depends on timing, governance and communication, not just market conditions. As the liquidity of the token continues to fall per active, the pressure on projects to prove the viability due to cash flow and transparency is likely to intensify.
State in this article
